Sweeping the Trash Under the Rug: Carbon Sequestration

Updated On
co2 storage

We may collect a share of sales from items linked to on this page. Learn more.

One of the technologies being touted as an answer to the climate change crisis is carbon sequestration. At its simplest, carbon sequestration is about collecting CO2, and taking it out of the atmospheric system, often by shoving it underground.

One of the simplest methods of carbon sequestration, though admittedly long-term, is to plant more trees. However, trees eventually die and decay, releasing their stored CO2. Long-term care and management is required to turn forests into effective carbon sinks for the massive amounts of CO2 emitted by industrial and power generation sources.

The common interpretation of carbon sequestration, though, is to pump the CO2 underground into some form of permanent storage.

The first step in carbon sequestration is to collect the CO2 from the source, and then to transport it to the sequestration sites. In Texas, they have a network of pipelines for this purpose, but other sites do not, and so transportation becomes another element, and a risk factor. CO2 can be poisonous in high concentrations. The CO2 eruption at Lake Nyos in Cameroon, where 1700 people died, can be taken as a warning of how deadly CO2 can be.

Deep saline storage is used in the North Sea region by Norway’s Sleipner project, where CO2 is injected under pressure into a deep saline aquifer. CO2 readily dissolves in water, and so the aquifer can absorb a great deal of CO2. Current production sees over 1 million tons of CO2 injected into the aquifer every year.

The government of the Province of Alberta recently announced a $2 billion Carbon Capture and Storage project. In this project, CO2 is to be captured and used primarily in Enhanced Oil Recovery operations. While this sounds like a good way to kill two birds with one stone, when CO2 is used in EOR operations, most of it comes back to the surface again, typically to be reused for further EOR operations. Used this way, it would take many cycles of recovery before the majority of the CO2 was interred, and even then, there is always more CO2. This seems unlikely as a long-term solution to anthropogenic CO2.

Other possibilities for carbon sequestration include mineral sequestration. CO2 will readily combine with the readily available metal oxides of magnesium and calcium, forming stable carbonates. While these reactions normally take place over geologic time periods, it is possible to hurry the process using higher temperatures and pressures, though at an energy cost.

CO2 can also be combined with seawater and injected under high pressure into deep-sea basalt formations. This reacts with the basalt, forming, again, stable carbonate minerals. Deep-sea basalt formations offer a number of safeguards for CO2 storage, and leakage is unlikely.

Reliance on carbon sequestration ignores, or at least avoids, the hard questions around fossil fuel use. It is more of a stopgap solution, buying us time while alternative energy sources becomes more effective and available. If that is how it is used, then carbon sequestration is a useful stepping-stone. Conservation, and the eventual elimination of fossil fuels is the most effective long-term answer. If, however, carbon sequestration is used as a smokescreen, as a way to avoid making hard decisions, then it does far more harm than good.

  • Colin Dunn

    Colin Dunn was born and raised in Northern Alberta. Growing up in the boreal forest gave him an appreciation for nature, an appreciation that was enhanced by the works of his artist mother, Svala Dunn, who captured the landscapes and wildlife of the north in her oils and watercolors. He holds a Degree in Geography from the University of Alberta, with a concentration in Urban Studies. He has since found career in information technology, but still pursues his first interests in geography and the environment. He lives and works in southern Vancouver Island, with his wife and three children.

What do you think? Leave a comment!